Generally, in a free and open society, in our public and common spaces, in the market place of both intercourse and ideas, we have no right of freedom from religion, freedom from diversity, freedom from differences of opinion, or even freedom from offense. If we so choose, we do have this freedom in our homes, in our chosen private institutions, and in our hearts. In between these forums resides our public institutions and our private businesses. The degree to which each should be restricted in presenting us to the tumult of opinion and religion depends upon the extent of our liberty to choose to participate therein.
As a consumer, we can choose not to attend a sporting event in which Tim Tebow or Mohammad Ali publicly praise their chosen Gods. However, we are not as free to divorce ourselves from the workplace or public institutions of education, where the sensibilities of the many should, and must, be taken into consideration, especially if our youth are affected (as their independence and choice is often restricted).
It is the balance between these different forums, the existence of each, that enriches our lives and leaves us free to truly follow our convictions–not the absence of one or the other.
Loren M. Lambert © December 13, 2011
As a consumer, we can choose not to attend a sporting event in which Tim Tebow or Mohammad Ali publicly praise their chosen Gods. However, we are not as free to divorce ourselves from the workplace or public institutions of education, where the sensibilities of the many should, and must, be taken into consideration, especially if our youth are affected (as their independence and choice is often restricted).
It is the balance between these different forums, the existence of each, that enriches our lives and leaves us free to truly follow our convictions–not the absence of one or the other.
Loren M. Lambert © December 13, 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment