When in the military, I held misgivings about disciplining soldiers for declining to fight in wars of "national interest." (The Vietnam war was a good example of this.)
I don't have a problem in waging war against those who directly attack us as a nation, such as in World War II. However, is "forced charitable killing" more benevolent than "forced charitable stealing?” Is it okay for the federal government to do?
Loren M. Lambert © July 2, 2010
I don't have a problem in waging war against those who directly attack us as a nation, such as in World War II. However, is "forced charitable killing" more benevolent than "forced charitable stealing?” Is it okay for the federal government to do?
Loren M. Lambert © July 2, 2010
No comments:
Post a Comment