Monday, November 26, 2018

Sports Fans, Coach Potatoes, and Slugs – How To Make This Year The One That Sticks

Gold's Gym was packed to the max. It must be that time of year when the dark and cold drives the hoards in for the smell of sweat and Christmas stocking perfume – not to mention the New Year.  I was going to mock them, but since it gives me a kick to see others experience joy, and I sincerely want them to succeed, I see that their presence is in their interest and mine. So, here's how to make it stick:

1. Take it slow and consistent. Don't be like the half-dozen newbies I saw grimacing and grunting so hard their eyeballs shot out across the gym to pierce the mighty bums up on the stairmasters. Build into it. It's consistency that matters. Be in for the long run. I promise if you are consistent, you will reach a time when regular workouts are as important to you as breathing, eating, sex, and yelling at the guy who cuts you off in traffic. It is almost that way for me.

2. If you bump up against an injury, illness, time crunch, bad hair, no time for make up, an emergency, or forgetting a key piece of your workout outfit, don't use it as an excuse to jettison your workout. Figure out what you can do – whether it's time for only a handful of push ups and sit ups, five trips up and down the stairs in a nearby building when you have only ten minutes to spare before or after your meeting, doing your workout in your dress shirt or bra – looking like a scarecrow. Just do something.

3. Don't worry what others think. Go for you and only you – for the long run. Gyms are like churches: They're there for the people who most need them – even if they are inhabited by close-to-perfection gods and goddesses.

4. Don't let your job – even if it’s physically demanding – substitute for working out. This is important, because in today's mechanized workplace, most physically demanding jobs do not condition your body in a balanced manner. Instead, they overstress some body parts and under-condition others. Therefore, you need exercise to round out your conditioning and to give your body a break from the assembly line with its stressful, repetitive movement.

5. Don't depend on trainers, friends, and classes as your only motivation. (Note: I did not say don't get a trainer, don’t go to a class, or don’t have a work out buddy. You want them if that makes your workout more effective, rewarding, and consistent. However, if you depend on them to keep you going, you might struggle to get going again as soon as the friend stops, your class is changed or canceled, or your trainer moves out of state, etc.) On the other hand, avoid trainers, classes, and friends who push you beyond your individual capabilities and may have no wisdom or maturity to understand that while we all may need support reaching our highest potential, we don't need to be driven beyond our ability and into injury and chronic pain. Despite the hype to the contrary, we really don't all have the same potential.

6. Don't work out to look good at your wedding, for your 10-year reunion, or for that girl you want to date. Use them for motivation, but work out as a lifestyle choice. That way, you won't disintegrate once the wedding's over or the girl jilts you.

7. Make the gym one of your communities by sometimes spending a little time in the sauna, steam room, or Jacuzzi (if it’s clean), getting to know your fellow gym rats. Most things that we consistently desire is a sense of belonging. Your sense of kinship with the others at the gym will help keep you going.

8. Lastly, mix it up a little and have fun. While keeping it consistent, try all the work out crazes. Return to what works the best for you and don't forget what it feels like to be a beginner.

Loren M. Lambert © January 8, 2013

Breath That Cuts Like A Chain Saw

The air is so dry, the molecules are so sharp, my breath is dragging a molecular chain saw over my sinus cavities. Soon, they will be cut plumb through, unless I cease breathing. This is a very hard thing to do, and once again, a delicate catch-22.

Loren M. Lambert © January 7, 2013

On Lifting 500 Pounds With My Ten-Pound Brain

Give me dreams that purge the coffee grounds of reading over-caffeinated mental health records. It's like lifting 500 pounds with your ten-pound brain.

Until manana.

Loren M. Lambert © January 4, 2013

Post From a Soldier

I read a post from a soldier stating he was upset with our government and if things didn’t go his way, he would break the law. Here’s what he and others (who feel the same) should consider:

Throughout history, a few of those who serve in uniform have often thought that by having put themselves in harm’s way, they have paid a price that can never be repaid nor sufficiently honored. Therefore, they take what they think they have earned: a right to assume a position in society above the rule of law. Some examples of this are Manuel Noriega, Hugo Chavez, Timothy McVeigh, and others who commit to disobey the law at the conclusion of their service.

While I will support a veteran's right to politic, speak out, vote, run for office – and within the rule of law – agitate for his or her position, I would not support a soldier’s professed right (while on active duty) to speak out against the government that enlists him and that he is, in fact, a servant of. I also would not support a soldier’s disregard of any laws that are passed within our legal system.

What veterans sometimes fail to appreciate and understand is that all the senators, congressional representatives, the federal judiciary, and the executive branch are the embodiment of the Constitution to which veterans swore allegiance when they put on the uniform during their service.

We, as a people, elected our representatives. They speak and act for us. That's how our government works. I have listened to soldiers speak ill toward elected officials of both parties as if the elected officials, through some violent or illegal act, appointed themselves and are acting alone. They do not. If soldiers disagree with an elected official and those who stand with this official, then once the soldiers are out of the service, they need to act as leaders, confront those with whom they disagree through our rule of law, do the hard work that current elected officials did, and run for office. If soldiers politically criticize a governmental official, they are criticizing the American people and the Constitution. That is why soldiers on active duty cannot legally participate in some political activity.

Don't be veterans who would make themselves a dictator over one, like Timothy McVeigh, or a dictator over many, like so many third-world leaders. There is no honor in disengaging and making oneself an outlaw in a country where all are free to participate in our democracy. This takes greater courage. That is what a patriot does.

We don't live in a democracy because we get everything our way. If you are done with your "service," which is what it was – a "service" – then accept America’s gratitude and put away your attitude and assumption of soldiers who think they have earned an entitlement to political authority (I'm not talking about your benefits and being taken care of, if injured). 

Be a citizen and a patriot, and work to achieve what you think is right within our system – as many have done: President George Washington, President Grant, President Roosevelt, President Eisenhower, President Kennedy, President Bush, Senator McCain, Senator Kerry, etc.

Loren M. Lambert © January 1, 2013

‘Twas The Night Before Election Day

‘Twas the night before election day and all through the house, the partisans were summoning votes from even a louse.
The lawn signs were plastered around without care,
In hopes that our candidates would no longer be rare.

The Republicans were nestled all snug in their beds,
While visions of one-party-rule danced in their heads...
But I heard him proclaim, as the Prez appeared in our sight,
"Happy Election day to all, and to all a good-night."

Loren M. Lambert © November 6, 2012

The Facts

Fact: A country with the cheapest ice cream will have a higher per capita ice cream consumption rate.

Fact: A country with more per capita dogs will have more per capita dog-bite-related injuries.

Fact: A country with a higher percentage of bowlers will have more people, per capita, dropping bowling balls on their toes.

Fact: A country awash with easily accessible narcotic pain medications will have a greater number, per capita, of narcotic deaths and addicts.

Fact: A country with the highest per capita gun ownership (90 out of every 100 Americans owns a gun) will have a higher per capita incident rate of gun-related deaths and accidents.

Fact: A country with a higher percentage of those with mental health conditions without access to mental health care – who also simultaneously live in a country with a higher percentage of gun ownership – will have a higher per capita percentage of tragic gun-related incidents involving the mentally ill.

This is not subject to argument (yes, I know, you'll try to say it is, but really it is not). The only question is: Do we accept it? Can anything be done about it? If so, what?

Loren M. Lambert © December 31, 2012

New Year’s Greetings

To Everyone:

I sincerely send you my love and my fondest hopes. May you all have great joy and happiness this next year; and may we help lighten any sorrows that come your way. Thanks for making last year such a treasure. I look forward to spending the next with you!!!

Loren M. Lambert © December 31, 2012

I Send You New Year’s Advice and Admonition: Skip the Commercials!

I didn't know it existed an hour ago. Now, it is over-shadowing my New Year’s celebrations.

What?

There’s a gold-plated $50 Buffalo Tribute Nickel for only $10?! That's right!  Fifty dollars for only $10! The ad informed me to call and buy, so that I would not suffer regret and disappointment. I felt so bad the split second I heard the ad, because I knew I wasn't going to call. Therefore, I knew that I was going to have an empty spot in my heart and soul for all time.

Most likely, years from now (when I don't have a thought in my brain), I will remember and then miss that shiny $50 gold Buffalo Tribute Nickel I could have owned for just $10.

If you find me, someday, drooling in my rocking chair and wearing a blank sad stare, just pat me on the back, dab my drool with my hankie, and softly and kindly remind me I should have called for that fifty-dollar Buffalo Nickel.

Word of advice: Free yourselves of guilt: Skip the commercials.

Loren M. Lambert © December 31, 2012

A “Manhole”

Women would not put up with a sewer-access point referred to as a “womanhole.” That's just how smart they are.

But us, men?

Welcome to the manhole.

Loren M. Lambert © December 31, 2012

Free Undergarment Fitting Sale at Dillard’s

I noticed one of my friend’s posts about her shopping spree with her kids at Victoria’s Secret. What a coincidence! Now, I must share a shopping spree that I experienced:

I went to a free, underwear fitting sale at Dillard’s Department Store and saw several, certified Swedish female fitters.

I really struggled finding the right brand and style to cradle my separately insured jewels and spigot, but these ladies went beyond and above the call of duty and fixed me up with the perfect pairs of underwear.

I settled on the latest, triple support and cooling technology from Calvin Klein. The pair takes into consideration that the male “package” is not just a homogeneous blob – so it stabilizes, positions, and supports, all at the same time, making those embarrassing hot weather and on-the-go adjustments forever a thing of the past!

Moreover, the butt-covering technology  has “just-right-Goldilocks-and-the-three-bears” weave that neither squeezes your butt cheeks together into the solid Ayers Rock monolithic dome, nor creeps in and up your crack. I no longer will have to worry about PTSD flashbacks by having to un-snuggie my undies and remember scouts or seventh grade.

Best of all, the nanotechnology  cooling system keeps the male “package” at nature’s optimal temperature: two to three degrees below my core body temperature. No longer am I waiting for heaven in the afterlife. It’s all right here – under my Levi's.

Watch out!

Loren M. Lambert © December 30, 2012

GUNS: A Hunter's Weapon of Choice – Regardless of the Prey

Yes, I hope there is someone with a gun to protect me if needed.  However, I hope, more, that there's never anyone with a gun against whom I must be protected. An example of this is a former client’s ex-husband, an ex-Vietnam war sniper who exhibited severe PTSD and engaged in numerous discussions with his VA therapist, saying that he wanted to kill other people, including his ex-wife. He also threatened to kill me!

This man owned 19 guns in his arsenal (several of them assault weapons).  His son was convicted of attempted murder after using one, and there was, and is, nothing we could do about it, due to the patient-doctor privilege, which a particular state saw as a lack of evidence.

Also, due to the fact that the two had been divorced for many years, the state also saw no evidence that he wanted to kill his ex-wife.

I can’t help but be concerned about the mentally ill who might own a gun.  I represent numerous clients who can’t access mental health care on a regular basis, who have become homeless after going through a crisis that put them through a cycle of being 1) hospitalized or incarcerated, 2) put on medications, 3) stabilized, 4) released into the community, 5) functional for a while (but not getting healthcare), 6) decomposed, 7)  homeless, and 8) put through the whole process over again. 

No, I don't want to take away your guns. You may be sane. I own a gun and I have hunted. I was trained by the NRA, have served in the military, and have dealt with many situations involving violent people with violent histories. I want a rational discussion that seeks balance with a three-pronged approach of adequate security, rationale gun ownership, gun type oversight, and a comprehensive mental healthcare system.

I don't want to live in a police state, nor in a community where the psychologically challenged have easy access to a gun. The simplistic and shallow people hallmark portraitures and post them as their perceived reflection of truth and reality, which add nothing to the conversation.

The military, my own training, and my experience have taught me this truth: If  psychologically disturbed people want to kill you, and want to do it with a gun, they usually will succeed, because the element of surprise trumps the men, women, or teachers with the gun in their holster, desk, or gun cabinet. (But yes, they can minimize the damage.)

The argument that they could do it just as easily with a car, knife, bomb, etc. is almost meritless. My training has also taught me that if those are their choices, they will be more likely to fail than if they use a gun. That is why most of us don't hunt with bombs, cars, knives, or poison. A gun is readily available, easy to use, quick, and efficiently lethal. That's why most psychopaths, the suicidal, the criminal, the mentally unstable, and the passionately enraged also hunt/kill with a gun. If a deranged, mentally ill, enraged person runs to his/her closet to pick something with which to kill you, he/she will probably pick the gun over a bomb, a knife, a bat, or some rat poisoning. That is the reality, people. If a few lives are saved every year because persons with a known proclivity to violence, or a troubled mental health history, are unable to purchase or obtain a gun (or because a person with a mental health challenge is able to access mental health care), that is a worthy goal, despite the fact that others would still die in gun-related violence.

No perfection on this issue can be achieved, because any such solution that tries to appease the extremes of either side would invariably be unduly ineffective, too intrusive, too expensive, or utterly tyrannical.

Loren M. Lambert © December 29, 2012

The Path and The Way: Sacred Writings of the Chartosi, The Book of None

21:1. And it came to pass that the Creator of all things heard the pleas of the pinnacle fauna of Tsai and revealed to the founders that there existed – beyond the event horizon in the first quadrant of the fifth universe (at its most equidistant edge) – a peculiar creature, a paradox of creative innovation, the most conflicted, yet intellectually nimble of all of God's pinnacle fauna.

21:2. To such, the Creator had – through the exercise of agency – made accessible the fruit of opposition, and in partaking thereof, the creature added to the yang of instinct, the yin of reason.

21:3. And behold, unto this creature, the Creator had foreordained and had endowed within it, the capacity and the calling to bring into balance the Angram, and to restore the propagation of the Chartosi.

21:4. Yet behold, the Creator beseeched, and by admonition warned, that the creature's strength was equally its weakness. For behold, the schism of these divergent intelligences made this most peculiar of all God's pinnacle beings. They were prone to rebel against reason, and to worship raw ritual and cold convention, or to revile against instinct and regal inflexible intellectualism and unbounded learning – devoid of wisdom and restraint.

21:5. Furthermore, the Creator warned, the creature could also reject both reason and instinct to devolve into a schizophrenic existence of malcontent and dissonance; to thereby deny the power of order and organization and the liberation of intuition and spontaneity; and to fall speedily upon the path of dark oblivion with its woe of death and damnation, of non-existence and nothingness.

21:6. Yet, in the end, the Creator left it to the founders the decision to set the creature upon the path of it and our destiny – whether for good or for evil, whether for salvation or rebounding renewal in a future in which God, in his wisdom, would not yet reveal.

Loren M. Lambert © December 29, 2012

Imagine Demons

“Imagine Demons,” a great group with tendentious songs, has been asked to entertain at the "New Year’s U.S. Congressional Ball." The representatives love them. They stand, sway, lip sync, mime, and air guitar all their songs: "Sleeper Liberal," "You Are an Ass, I am Your Island," "I Carry a Bigger PAC," "While You are Lame, I Love You Because You Give Me Someone to Blame," and my favorite, "There's An Elephant in My Soup."

Loren M. Lambert © December 29, 2012

Do We Really Own Our Country?

Ahh, Jacob (my Facebook friend)! You say, "I would never be in a situation where I owned a free-and-clear Mercedes and did not have insurance on it. That’s nuts!" 

However, this is what we did, as a country (both the right, the left, the middle, and the “bassackward”), didn’t we?  It's not shit that is filling the house (our Republic), it's loved ones, enemies, (milk) subsidies, safety nets, corporate golden parachutes, spent arms we never purchased, and shattered and broken lives we pulled out from under the wreckage of war.  The analogy of “raising the ceiling” is cute in that it uses a few of the same words for "raising" the debt "ceiling.” However, it is truly a matter of how we raise the ceiling when the reality is: There is no present way to get it done without sacrifice and a long-term plan. The divergent absolutes cannot tolerate the presence of each other’s positions, so they refuse to compromise.

Loren M. Lambert © December 29, 2012

The Road To Hell...

The road to hell is paved by good intentions, and it is traveled by those with good reflections. I guess liberals build the highways and conservatives travel them.

Loren M. Lambert © December 28, 2012

Leave Things As You Would Want To Find Them

We individually inherit the bathroom whenever we use it, so if you find a mess or make one, it behooves you to either hide in there until you can leave without anyone noticing your exit, or leave it like you would want to find it (that is, if you didn’t find it too hideous when you entered).  This is a good rule for many things we encounter. That's why I get invited on car rides or to people’s home as a house guest all the time. Heck, some people even beg me to use their bathroom or try to get me to guzzle liquids as soon as I visit.

Loren M. Lambert © December 28, 2012

The Inquisition: A Repeat

Many western democracies that arose out of different religious traditions (at least the smart ones), learned some time ago that absolute power corrupts absolutely, no matter what religion you claim to represent, whose god you worship, or even if you and those who believe you, say you speak for god.

Many in the Muslim world do not believe this, nor know it to be true. Like rebellious teens flexing their new-found strength after throwing off the shackles of their culture, or the strictures of dictatorial parents, they imagine that, unlike all the other tyrannies professing God, somehow they will be different.

This is even the sentiment of some of the moderate Muslims I have met and know. They think that while "benevolent dictatorships" have failed in the past, and have invariably disintegrated into bloody horrific tyrannies, they will be different. This, they pridefully assume, is because these other "benevolent dictatorships" were set up by the wrong religions. Now, they foolishly imagine, with Islam taking power, absolute power can be safely entrusted to "Islamic brotherhoods."

Sadly, since they are smug about their place in the pantheon of religions, many Muslim countries will all have to experience their own inquisitions, dark ages, Third Reichs, and religious wars. This is what is happening in Egypt and Iran, and will most likely happen in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, and Palestine, etc.

Try as we might, while we may be able to persuade them to choose otherwise and convince them that good can thrive with freedom, in the end – as the fictional "Freddy," the Iraqi translator in Green Zone said – it is not for us to decide what happens in their countries. They must learn that absolute power corrupts absolutely, even when given to those professing to speak on behalf of Allah. In humility, they must understand that religion can only be an elevating force when it is left unfettered by the corrupting influence of absolute power.   

Loren M. Lambert © December 27, 2012

Merry Christmas Wishes

Merry Christmas! Happy Holidays! Let's make the most out of the next year and not hang our heads down, despite any challenges we may face. The fact that our engagement is so robust is a sign of our greatness. Love you, all!

Loren M. Lambert © December 24, 2012

A Kind Of World In Which To Live

Some believe in the divine nature of men, yet cannot conceive of any world except one in which everyone is bristling with as many instrumentalities of death as our means allow. However, by grasping unrestrained for evermore security, it always seems to more assiduously elude us.

That is not to infer that somehow the absence of arms will pacify our psychopaths and criminals. It won’t. We must be prepared, but there is a balance we must strike.

The benefit of living in as disarmed a community as our natures will allow is not so that we live in ignorance, and at the mercy of the wolves who are ever present at our doors. The benefit lies with the humble understanding that even the best of us (hit with moments of heightened stress, extreme need, or justifiable anger), as well as even the meekest of us (beleaguered by illness, age, and ill treatment) are more able to live up to our better natures with our hands at some distance from the triggers of death, and with our minds enlightened by environments that mirror the aspirations of our hearts. 

While I require a world that has its armies and police forces, I do not want to live in a world in which an extension of everyone's road rage, fear, anger, and paranoia is a loaded assault rifle within their whitened grips.

Loren M. Lambert © December 22, 2012

NRA Offers to Pay for Armed Guards in Each School

Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the National Riffle Association (NRA), recommends that we secure an armed guard in every school in America. According to the Utah Public School Directory (http://utah.educationbug.org/public-schools/), there are 899 public schools in Utah.

If $40,000 was paid as a yearly salary to one armed guard in each school, and if $30,000 was spent on administration, training, supervision, equipment, and support, then 63 million dollars a year would be the added expense to our state budget. (Of course, this assumes that one guard per school would be effective in preventing mass shootings and not, in and of itself, cause additional problems.)

There are approximately 1,115,000 tax-paying adults in Utah. It would cost each one about $56 a year and necessarily require a tax increase.

Extrapolating across the nation, approximately 10,000 public schools operate. To hire a guard in each one would cost roughly $700 million per year. Given that the cost of living is much greater in other states, the cost would probably strip about $90 per tax payer.

However, conservatives and Republicans do not want to raise taxes, and many conservatives do not want to limit gun ownership, in any manner.

According to the NRA, (http://www.statisticbrain.com/national-rifle-association-nra-statistics/) the NRA has 4.3 million members. Hence, if they bore the burden of this new police force, it would only cost each member $162 per year. Problem solved. It is a small price for the cost of freedom and gun liberty.

(No, this is not necessarily my opinion. Just food for thought. Please critique my rough calculations. They are, like me, probably very fiscally conservative.)

Loren M. Lambert © December 21, 2012

End-Of-The-World Football

It's was very nice that the Poinsettia Bowl organization scheduled BYU to play before the end of the world.  Even better: They just might win! Too bad the U of U's world already ended.

Loren M. Lambert © December 20, 2012

Can’t Get Enough!

You can never get enough of what you don't really need.

Loren M. Lambert © December 19, 2012

Politics – Let Everyone Grieve As They Choose

One person's politics is another's chosen manner of grieving. Let everyone grieve as they choose.

Loren M. Lambert © December 17, 2012

Looking For Secluded Getaway

Dear Facebook Friends,

I am looking for a secluded getaway (not necessarily free) to write – without any distractions – between Christmas and New Year’s Day. Any ideas? Since I am the consummate new-world spy/environmentalist/econ nut/bad ass/ in-tune, sensitive, new-age man, I do not leave a trace.  I will go under the radar. blend in with the scenery, and will go completely incognito. Email me at arrowlegalsolutions@gmail.com.

Loren M. Lambert © December 16, 2012

On Taking Vicarious Pleasure In Others’ Achievements

I have what I need. I have enough to experience joy and happiness. It is really my choice. So, why so discontent? Why the ambition?

Today, on my swim, I occupied a lane next to a guy who could (what appeared to be effortlessly), swim circles around me. Understand that I execute a very efficient stroke; I am in relatively robust health and good condition. Nonetheless, without a genetic modification or a Lance Armstrong boost, I could not “best” this guy – and many others – at the peak of my health and with as efficient a stroke as the best training could equip me. Still, it would be nice; and still, I want more.

Years ago, this realization would have brought a bit of despair – this inability to compete – to swim faster, run longer, climb higher. Not any more. At least, not as much. Today, in this here and now, I just marvel at how amazing and wonderful different people are with their varied exceptional abilities. Watching their prowess and imagining their sense of exhilaration makes me smile and guiltily take vicarious pleasure in their achievement.

I'd like to report that it is because I have, like many Buddhists, diminished my clinging and longing. Rather than any new-age enlightenment, this contentedness has more to do with bumping up against mortality and God and natures' gifts of imperfections.

What would life be without struggle, without reaching for more or striving for perfection, even when an aging vessel puts it further from my reach? Answer: not much, at least not for me.

So, when you pass me on your swim, your run, or during your climb, understand that you're no longer putting me in your wake, but placing yourself in my line of vision where I and others can praise the wonder and miracle of our existence. Climb on, live strong, be at peace – ahead or behind.

Loren M. Lambert © December 13, 2012

And It Came To Pass After Deliverance From the Fiscal Cliff...

"And behold, it came to pass that after my chosen, exceptional people were delivered forth out of the refiner's fire of the fiscal cliff (or, as I like to call it: the debarking mill), the fruit of righteousness, which is peace, was the meat of their succor; and the MSNBC and Fox News correspondents laid down together and supped and did other things together.

Their children were pragmatic, balanced, intelligent, wise, and even still had nice hair, tan skin, gleaming teeth, ample access to plastic surgery, and articulate, kissable lips. And they would not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain; for the land was filled with knowledge of Jehovah, like the waters covering the sea." Isaiah 1/1/2013.

Loren M. Lambert © December 11, 2012

Calling On All Skydivers!

Calling on all skydivers, para-sailors, hang gliders, and be-layers, etc.! Sharpen up your skills, or get them. You can either enjoy the ride (with the view), or just scream to the bottom – where you will eventually wake up.

Loren M. Lambert © December 10, 2012

Blessings Of Life Will Come To Us When We Merit Them

"The more we put our leaders on a pedestal, the more we take the onus of responsibility off of our own shoulders,” said Richard Nelson (playwright), who meant that as a negative thing.

When we expect or imagine that our leaders are perfect or omnipotent, we then think we can sit back and do business as usual, and that they can save us from our folly and we don't have to take responsibility for our own actions and contributions to our problems. This goes for all spectrums of the political – right to left.

It may also be the problem for those who view God as not only perfect, but as able and poised to rescue us from our bad economic decisions, our greed, our ill-advised wars, and our destruction of our environment. That’s not going to happen. The blessings of life will come to us when we merit them.

Loren M. Lambert © December 9, 2012

Sex: Obsession vs. Vilification

While an obsession with sex may objectify one's partner, the vilification of sex or of desire makes one's partner a perversity.

Loren M. Lambert © December 8, 2012

Herb Cowan Says: Don’t Eat Yer Planting Seed!

"It don’ madder how hungry ya are.  If ya eat all yer planting seed, you've eaten yer last harvest. That's what some want us to do: eat yar crop seed while the fat bacon hangs in the curing shack." said Herb Cowan, large vegetable farmer and honorary member of the Skull and Bones Society.

Loren M. Lambert © December 7, 2012

Have We Acted More Like Greece or Palestine?

During the past 10 years, have we acted more like Greece or Palestine in our economic practices? (Aside from the fact that the Palestinian economy has been hampered by it's isolation, what else has brought it to an impending economic collapse?)

Loren M. Lambert © December 5, 2012

Hannity Uses Facts and Reason!

Alert!
         
For a brief moment in time, Sean Hannity actually used facts and reason to bolster his argument. But alas! The moment soon passed; yet, for that same brief moment, I knew there was once a place called Camelot.

Loren M. Lambert © December 5, 2012

It Needs Cooling “Down There”

Another victim of global warming!

The French sperm count has fallen by about 30 percent over the last 17 years.

Yes, ladies, if you didn't know, the placement is not just for show and protection. It needs to be cooler “down there.”

Don't be surprised when those aging athletes start icing more than just their thighs.

Loren M. Lambert © December 4, 2012

Must “Painful Truth” Come From Extremists?

We don’t need bigoted, doltish, superficial, and internecine “painful honesty,” if the “painful truth” means that we define all people who overtly (by their actions, words, or association) represent the very worst in excesses, extremes, and depravity, and who are considered to be part of a group or organization – whether it’s the GOP, the Democrats, the Mormons, or the progressives. Rush Limbaugh is a foul ass with no redeemable quality other than he acts as the extreme rights' sewage depository of all things hateful and ugly.

Loren M. Lambert © December 3, 2012

Disappear Your Ears

It's hard work making your ears disappear. Better done when you're a teen or maybe a genius, eccentric, impressionist painter.

Loren M. Lambert © December 3, 2012

Rush Limbaugh Cites Places Where Liberals Live

Mr. Limbaugh said if you want to know who the liberals are who constitute the Democratic party, all you needed to do is look at Cuba, Detroit, California, and Venezuela. This man is truly deranged and is a demagogue. He does not play any useful purpose in American politics, and all good, fair-minded, peace-loving Americans should stop supporting him.

Loren M. Lambert © December 2, 2012

Zombie Dreams

Do you experience boring or forgettable nightly dreams?  Supercharge them by writing a zombie screen play! Who would have thought?

Forty-eight hours ago, I really didn't get the “zombie thing” and now they're populating my subconscious.

Loren M. Lambert © December 1, 2012

Feeling Like I Ran A Marathon At The End Of The Day

Sometimes, at the end of a day, I feel I have metaphorically – and at times, quite literally – run a marathon. However, actually running a marathon would have been better, because I and others could have witnessed and measured the progress made from having traveled many miles from point A to point B.

To all of you unheralded and behind-the-scenes marathon runners, who fight the good fight everyday, I salute you and will now clap, stamp my feet, and cheer for twenty seconds. Then, it's off to bed.

Loren M. Lambert © November 28, 2012

Woman Lack Esteem, While Men Boast Too Much

It’s time for an over-generalization. Tell me if you think there is any truth to this:

Women are inherently guilt-ridden and lacking in self-esteem when they have no reason to be, and men are inherently remorseless and cocky when reality reveals they should not be. It is not the Yin and the Yang of harmony and balance, but the Zing and the Bang of dissonance and disequilibrium that is, at times, the nature of things.

This last Sunday, I just saw a gentleman rise to sing. Before starting, he made several comments causing me to anticipate that I was about to hear one of the great moments in music history. I really was expecting it. He walked the walk, talked the talk, but did not sing the song! It was pretty awful. Any way, it was an interesting view into the realities of self-perception and self-awareness.

Loren M. Lambert © November 26, 2012

My Teenage Driver

Survived a trip on the freeway – a first for my budding teenage driver! Is it best to take a little Valium, or something, before going on such a ride?

Loren M. Lambert © November 25, 2012

Enjoy The Gravitational Attraction With That Someone

"When objects attract each other gravitationally, they exchange streams of gravitons; the gravitons are invisible messengers that communicate gravity's influence. The more gravitons the objects exchange, the stronger the mutual graviton pull." ~Brian Greene, best-selling author-physicist, and one of the world’s leading string theorists.

Be sure to exchange some gravitons, today, with the one to whom you are gravitationally attracted, and enjoy that mutual graviton pull.

Loren M. Lambert © November 23, 2012

Police Polish Turds Better!

Politicians, preachers, and used cars sales magicians are no match to police officers when it comes putting polish on turds. Wish you all could have been with me in court to watch it.

Loren M. Lambert © November 20, 2012

From Ken Burn’s Dust Bowl Series

I’ve been catching a few parts of the Ken Burn's Dust Bowl series. Makes me hearken back to Yogi Berra's quote: "It's deja vu all over again," and Haggard’s statement: "I'm proud to be an Okie from Muskogee."

Aren't we all Okies?

Loren M. Lambert © November 19, 2012

Repertory Dance Theatre (RDT)

I love dance concerts – especially when I get to watch my daughter perform! I highly recommend the Repertory Dance Theatre’s (RDT) presentation of 100 years of modern dance. The performances “took us” from dance’s inception (at least in U.S. history) to the present.

It's a great celebration of creativity, genius, athleticism, sensuality, vibrancy, spirituality, and movement, all to provoke the mind, enliven the spirit, and entertain the heart.

(An extra plus is the dance crowd [lots of smart, trim, natty, and connected people in attendance], who seemed to dance simply when getting into and out of their seats!)

Loren M. Lambert © November 16, 2012

These Are the Questions

These are the questions: Please the kids, or please the palate? A Tale of which of Two Cities? Will the meal be out of a can, or created from scratch? The Green Belt, or the Red Rock? A yearly holiday battle between "Have This," or "Have That?"

Loren M. Lambert © November 15, 2012

Your Public Display Could Invite Victimization

A study shows that if you publicly display that you deviate from the norm, then deviant people feel more justified in victimizing you. More money was stolen, more often, from a car in a car wash when the professor dressed more “bummy” and left crushed beers cans and porn magazines in his vehicle while being washed.

Loren M. Lambert © November 14, 2012

Donkey Stamps

Today, a market for donkey stamps increased exponentially when Ann Coulter said that the reason the Republicans won is because of President John F. Kennedy's immigration policies in 1964 that have imported Democrats from abroad. I had no idea that the U.S. only allowed people to immigrate who sported a donkey stamped on their forehead. Invest in donkey stamps, immediately!

This woman is a genius and now I know why she is the darling of the right wing. My only disappointment is I wanted to hear her and the rest of the lunatic right sing a different song for a while.

Loren M. Lambert © November 7, 2012

Vote For Politicians Who Prioritize Everyone’s Best Interest

Vote for politicians who understand an issue from all angles, all sides, and can play ahead the consequences of the different choices and can explain why their desired choice is best for everyone – not just a selective group, nor just for you. Don't pick politicians who simply want to pick fights, appeal to our baser natures to blind us emotionally, and to make them look like they are doing something.

Loren M. Lambert © November 6, 2012

Sunday Dinner With My Hungry College Kids

I was blessed to spend a Sunday dinner with a pack of hungry college students to whom I am related. We should all take comfort in the fact there are a lot of really smart, energetic, humble, giving youth poised and ready to make the world a better place.

Loren M. Lambert © November 5, 2012

Consider The Opposition In This Election

People in Utah bestow virtue to perfidy so long as it is suited with Republican credentials and "the church's passport."

While this approach may be a good starting point, as it suggests a politician's affinity with the voters' values, it will serve us better if we dig a bit further.

As an Independent who has, for the most part, voted democratic this year (with a few exceptions), I know most of you, as usual, will not give heed to what I must say. However, I submit you would be better off if you did.

You see, I know, from personal experience, the following: Top Republican leaders of Utah have swept a lot of really bad stuff under their Republican suits. We have lost millions of dollars in defending statement legislation, and also from improper contracting. Our officials often interpret legislation – promulgated to protect us – in as narrow a manner as possible. Many state agencies are woefully backlogged (Adjudication Division of the Labor Commission) because they are undermanned and underfunded. This is what happens when we do not hold our majority party accountable, but always give them a free election pass.

All I ask (if not this year) is consider why the opposition may be a good choice.

Loren M. Lambert © November 5, 2012

Epoch Clouds

When clouds are more to be watched than rolling seas and shattered tectonics, the epoch of the storm is unleashed upon us.

Loren M. Lambert © November 3, 2012

Thomas Ricks: a Non-Partisan Expert You Need To Study & Whose Ideas Support President Obama

Thomas Ricks, author of new book, "The Generals," was interviewed on Fresh Air today. He shared many of my same ideas:

First, he said that one percent of America is accumulating significant wealth and one percent of America does all the dying in war. Without a draft, we (and more importantly, the one percent who control the wealth and power), become disconnected from the politics of war and take it for granted that soldiers die in these conflicts. We would be more careful in our politics if we had a draft.

He also mentioned that in war, there is wisdom in not setting withdrawal deadlines, and in setting them. You should know the arguments on both sides if you have thought at all about this issue. Mr. Ricks agrees with President Obama. Here's when I think it cuts one way or the other, and why I also think President Obama is right and Mitt Romney is wrong (and frankly I think Mitt simply disagrees just to disagree):

If you are in for the long run to wage all-out war and completely annihilate the opposition until there is unconditional surrender, you don't tell them when you are withdrawing. On the other hand, if you are a foreign force that is acting as a surrogate for a domestic armed force (as we are in Afghanistan), you need those local, domestic forces to know they have to take on the responsibility for their own country's security, or they will take it for granted that you will always be there. It's like telling an adult child that the free ride in Mommy and Daddy’s house is going to come to an end.

Although I recognize that President Obama's administration has not been perfect, Obama has shown more balance, more understanding, and more wisdom in world affairs than Mr. Romney.

When the political right claims that we are disrespected in the world, who are they talking about, and what is their proof?  Answer: not Europe, and not our allies. They are talking about terrorists and dictatorships in places where the political and cultural dynamics are completely beyond our power to effectively direct or influence. The radical elements in these places hate us and disrespect us because of the values that we share collectively, not because of the things that divide us politically, or because of any of Romney's contrived perceptions of our weakness. These radicals have created a god of hatred and homicidal rage. This is their motivation. This is what drives them, not any perceived weakness that they have come to know by reading spreadsheets on our military spending. The configuration of our military means nothing to them until our helicopters are at their doorsteps.

Mr. Ricks also believed Mitt's desire to increase the military budget to over four percent of our GNP is irresponsible in peacetime. In virtually all instances, when the U.S. has wound down from war, its military budget has decreased. Ricks also mentioned that at the height of the British Empire, the British spent two percent of their GNP on its military. It should also be remembered that the collapse of the USSR was substantially due to its bloated military spending. We shouldn't make that same mistake at this time.

Finally, Mr. Ricks emphasized that just as Republicans lament or allege that Democrats throw money at problems, there is currently substantial inefficiencies and waste in the military. Throwing more money at it will not equate to a stronger military.

Moreover, as is being silently, but wisely understood by President Obama, Pakistan (with over 100 nuclear warheads) is a greater threat to world peace than Iran. It is spiraling into radicalism.

When you vote, think about which candidate is most likely to endanger our troops unnecessarily by prolonging war in Afghanistan, or by starting a war in Iran or other places to try to "install friendly" governments. (Mitt Romney.)

I urge you to vote for the wiser of the two: President Barack Obama.

Loren M. Lambert © November 2, 2012

Blue Skies of Guilt, a Write-In Candidate, & Matheson Mangled

Enjoying such a beautiful evening makes me feel guilty when I know so many in New York are cold, distressed, and wondering how they'll make it through the year.

I voted today. (First, I went to Trolley Square [long lines]. Then I went to Murray [lines moved pretty fast].) The only vote I may regret is my write-in candidate for Congress: Loren M. Lambert. I did this because, for over a year, I have never been able to get a response from Matheson's campaign office on a question I had. Matheson has tried to be all things for all purposes to the point he metaphorically looks like he's been rolled out over too much pavement by a steam roller. Also, I don't like Mia Love as a representative. I think she's unqualified for the job.

We may have our own Utah version of Sarah Palin headed to the Congress – and it may be my fault. I apologize ahead of time to those who wanted Matheson. I tried to make myself hold my nose and vote for him, but I just couldn't.

Loren M. Lambert © November 2, 2012

Will We Show Ourselves to Be A Nation With Courage or One of Petty Selfishness?

Most everyone's argument against healthcare reform is that they have never had a problem accessing healthcare, or that they or someone they know accessed healthcare through charity. In essence, they are saying,  "I have it, some other people I know have it, so I could care less if millions of others, regardless of the reasons, do not have it."

Why is that mode of thinking the American way? This isn't about who has a two-ton pick-up truck or a vacation to the Caribbean. It's about access to basic healthcare and creating a rational way of paying for it. If that's un-American, then it's un-American to go to war for this country.

Loren M. Lambert © October 31, 2012

The Truth About Unemployment/Jobs

If you got Mitt Romney out of the spotlight and speaking candidly about Bain Capital’s (his company) leverage takeover of businesses, here is what he would say: "If a company is sick, sometimes the best thing for it is to cut jobs, lay people off." Similarly, if you asked him what would be healthy for a country that has an economy and economic boom built up on irrational speculation – whether on real estate, dot-com businesses, or Tulips (that naturally bust) – he would have to admit that during the bust of such an economic cycle, there naturally, and healthily, must be job losses and rising unemployment.

However, here’s also the irrefutable truth: We could have little to zero unemployment if our captains of industry wanted it. All they would have to do (research David Siegel and his "dream home" and high rise in Las Vegas) is to relinquish the gains they achieved during the economic boom, put that money to work back in the economy, and structure their workforce to be inclusive instead of exclusive.

People think that full employment must be based on specific types of jobs and that if those jobs aren't around, unemployment is the consequence – whether it’s oil jobs (the claim of conservatives), keystone pipeline jobs (also the claim of conservatives), whale blubber jobs, bird guano jobs, wagon train jobs, steam engine jobs, house carriage jobs, candle-making jobs, crucifix-making jobs, mastodon-hunting jobs, etc. Jobs are not, and never have been, the issue. What is an issue is whether it is the collective will of a people to have full employment.

There is a group/culture of people that has traditionally had greater employment rates, regardless of the times, than other cultures and groups. Why? Some would whine and claim that this is due to negative forces, which would be false. The reason for their high employment rate is their ingenuity, collective will, belief, attitude, and culture of education that makes the difference.

We have high unemployment because America's industry collectively wants it this way. It has nothing, whatsoever, to do with the government, except in one instance. The captains of industry simply do not want to allow access to healthcare to all Americans. This is not because it is an unachievable goal, but because they wrongly think that the economic pie cannot be so divided without diminishing their standard of living and pleasure from that same pie. However, this is only a small part of the problem.  The predominating reason is simply that it is what they want. Like Mitt Romney, they believe that when a company or country is sick, layoffs and unemployment is the best medicine.

Loren M. Lambert © October 30, 2012

Latest Revelations On President Obama's Ineptitude

Sean Hannity: "Come on Juan. It's been over 24 hours and President Obama has still not called it what in fact it was, and everybody knows it was a 'cyclone.' Instead, he's wimped out, like usual, and called it a hurricane. To top it off, instead of calling it a national catastrophe, he called it a natural disaster.”

Juan Williams: "No, he did use the word 'cyclone.'"

Sean Hannity:  "That was only in a general sense, and then after the beating he took in the polls–"

Juan Williams: "Not all the facts are in. As soon as they are, I am confident that he'll call it a 'cyclone,' if necessary."

Sean Hannity: "Whatever. When is America going to wake up?"

Juan Williams: "That's 'arise' Sean, not 'wake up.'"

Loren M. Lambert © October 30, 2012

Those With No Valid Argument Quibble Over Semantics

Why does anyone give a flying fruitcake about whether a heinous act is labeled "terrorism,” “murder,” or given some other descriptive term? Is it so the hate-mongers can contrive something nefarious, which they read between the lines and create conspiracy theories that have no basis in reality?

Loren M. Lambert © October 28, 2012

Tax Plan I Support

I support a tax plan that requires contribution to national expenses in proportion to one's benefit from and use of national assets, and that does not impose a burden upon those who, because of disability and misfortune, cannot contribute without depriving them of the bare-minimum necessities to sustain life.

In times of war, economic collapse, and catastrophic emergencies, I temporarily support the most efficient, wise, and practicable approach to win the war, prevent complete societal collapse, rebuild infrastructure, and restore civilization up and including the ultimate sacrifice of life itself (as occurred in the first and second World Wars).

Loren M. Lambert © October 28, 2012

My Private Art Gallery, Valued In the Millions

Every morning, I enjoy the incomparable privilege of waking up and seeing the multi-million-dollar art piece of the Wasatch Mountains with Grandeur, Olympus, Twin, and Lone Peaks looming up before me like ineffable jewels whose facets present an ever-changing array of abject beauty that also sees me safely to my bed each day. It, alone, would be enough to feed my soul and body, if only I had no need of sustenance, air, and water.

Loren M. Lambert © October 28, 2012

Middle Eastern Woman Complains About Mistreatment of Women

I was listening to right-wing radio host, Billy Cunningham. A woman of Middle Eastern origin was ranting about President Obama not doing anything about the mistreatment of women in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and in other Arab/Muslin countries.

Please be aware that President Obama is not Captain America, Superman, nor the Iron Man. For those of you who don't realize this, know that here and abroad, those shows are fictional. President Obama cannot single-handedly fix the world's problems – not now, and probably not in the next four years.

Loren M. Lambert © October 28, 2012

Hannity's Fantasy Playground – a Place for America's Rabid Wackos

I listened to Sean Hannity today. His guest was a completely wacky commentator who made a ridiculous fantasy-land claim that President Carter “made the Shah of Iran put the Ayatollah into power,” and that President Obama and Hillary Clinton undermined the Egyptian army so that the Muslim brotherhood could rise to power. 

The Muslim brotherhood rose to power as the antithesis against a brutal dictator named Hosni Mubarak, and because the people of Egypt elected him, whether we like that or not.

The Shah of Iran was deposed because he was a brutal, corrupt, and despicable dictator who was deposed by the Iranian people by a popular revolution over which we had no control. (We had, in essence, energized this by our installation of the Shah and our unconditional support of him.)

Hannity’s platform to the psychotic is complete scatology. His support for these wackos is no different than Iran’s support for Mahmound Ahmandinejad, who claims the Holocaust never happened.

The wacko on the Sean Hannity show further alleged that it is President Obama and Hillary Clinton’s mission to put into power Al Qaeda across the Middle East. This allegation is so incredibly outlandish that anybody claiming to have any journalistic discretion would have immediately shut the man up.

I would have no problem if President Obama loses the presidency because of factual information. But this is not what is happening. There is some visceral, ill-founded, and specious hatred toward President Obama and Hillary Clinton that has absolutely nothing to do with their policies or reality. The only thing that this can be attributed to is an unconscious or conscious racism and sexism against the two. Stop giving these outlandish voices a podium.

Sean Hannity is not a journalist. By giving these psychopaths a voice, he is just as intellectually bankrupt and as despicable as they are. He is nothing more than a poly evangelist who will allow anyone to say anything. He will say almost anything, regardless of its basis in reality, to achieve his ends of destroying President Obama and his administration. He has been on this warpath from day one. It is amazing that President Obama has been able to get anything done with such vitriolic hatred, racism, and sexism gripping the country.

Loren M. Lambert © October 28, 2012

Bain Capital Companies That Went Bankrupt

According to The Daily Show’s host, Jon Stewart, eight percent of the green energy companies that received stimulus money are bankrupt, and 22 percent of the companies in which Mitt Romney invested at Bain Capital went bankrupt.

Interesting. Probably true.

Loren M. Lambert © October 28, 2012

John Swallow: Another Stiff Shirt

I listened to an interview with John Swallow. He is so full of BS. I hate politicians who talk like lawyers, advocating for one side of a dispute. Almost all of them do this. Politicians are not elected to wear blinders so they only see one side of things and only represent those who got them elected. Mr. Swallow is myopic, petty, ideological, narrow, and is beholden to big government and big business. He cares nothing for government by the people and for the people.

Loren M. Lambert © October 26, 2012

Do You Want To Endure the "You’re-So-Full-of-Shit-Grin" for The Next Four Years? (Please, No!)

Watching Mitt in the debates, I thought he always looked like he wore this “you’re-so-full-of-shit-grin,” whenever he looked at President Obama. I thought I might be reading too much into this, but on my flight from Orlando to Las Vegas, a Mitt Romney supporter, who sat next to me – and who, I might add, carried on a very cordial conversation with me – said she thought the same. Please don't make that a permanent vision for the next four years.

Please participate in President Obama's campaign and send Mitt back to those who deserve his “you’re-so-full-of-shit-grin” (i.e., Newt, Sarah, Michelle, Herman, both Ricks, Murdock, T. Akin and the other Republican Tea Party Rapeologists, who all commented about when rape is bad, etc.).

See: http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/republican-rape-advisory-chart

Loren M. Lambert © October 26, 2012

David and Jackie Siegel (the Billionaire Cry Babies Who Support Mitt Romney)

I saw a very candid and wonderfully revealing documentary about David and Jackie Siegel – the owners of the biggest timeshare business, "Westgate Resorts."

The documentary showed their story starting before the recession, when David was riding the real estate speculation bubble. He made some interesting comments:

"I got President George W. Bush elected. I’d rather not say [how], it was probably illegal.

"We sold people timeshares they could not afford.... We were addicted to easy money.... We could get loans for anyone.... The goal was to change moochers into purchasers, no matter what."

The producers filmed the hard-sell script that Siegel’s employees used to secure sales at all costs. They were ruthless!

At this time, the Siegels started to build a 90,000-square-foot home patterned after Versailles, spending about 120 million in France. Around the same time, they built the biggest building in Las Vegas: the Westgate Towers (at over $300 million). These projects relied upon financing from continued sales of timeshares – almost like a giant ponzi scheme.

All the while, the Siegels lived the life of the most wealthy: buzzing around in private jets, spending lavishly, and buying all they laid their eyes on.

Then, the recession hit. As we know, this crash was brought on due to "cheap money" and people purchasing real estate they could not afford. Countries, like Greece, secured loans for massive public projects that they could not repay. As you can imagine, all hell broke out in the Siegel Empire.

Suddenly, the Siegels had to halt further construction on their 90,000-square-foot "dream home," enroll their eight kids in public school, refrain from taking their pack of dogs to the grooming services, sell off their jets and other assets, lay off many of their servants (from ages 18 to 5), lay off over 6,000 employees, and default on the Las Vegas Towers.

Instead of recognizing what really likely caused the crisis (e.g., their business model of “selling timeshares that people could not afford,” feeding their addiction with cheap money and credit, spending money they did not have, and becoming over-leveraged), the Siegels made these statements:

"It wasn't our choice. The banks made us lay off our employees.... The banks cut off our credit line to finance more timeshare sells."  Jackie claimed, "We didn't get any of the bailout money that was supposed to be for the common people like us." (Yes, she really said this! The documentary is called: The Empress of Versailles. Check it out for yourself.)

The Siegel Empire is one of the "small businesses" that Romney says should get a tax cut. These are the tycoons that are funding Romney. Siegel is the guy who would probably do the "illegal" to get him elected. Do you think they will expect something in return from Romney if he is elected?

Currently, David Siegel has been able to unload assets and buy them back at substantially reduced prices to unload the debt. He had to sell a controlling interest in his towers and has started construction on their "dream home."

To top it off, Siegel recently threatened his remaining employees’ jobs if President Obama is re-elected, saying  he was not going to add health insurance as an employee benefit.

I have a message for David and Jackie:

Although the documentary painted a negative view of your thought process, it also showed you to be human. You have also done a lot of positive things, and I would appeal to that aspect of your characters. Isn't it a better business plan to sell timeshares to those who can afford them, to build up equity in your many land holdings, to build up cash reserves to finance in-house sales, to live within your means and nurture a dedicated and healthy workforce by providing healthcare and scaling back upon your need for "dream homes" that will cost more than $200 million to complete?

(NOTE: The Siegels currently live in a house that would be the dream house of several families, simultaneously.)

Loren M. Lambert © October 24, 2012

Alien Inhabiting Romney’s Body at the Debate

I returned from Orlando (more on that later) and am able to listen to the debate. Who is the alien that has inhabited Mitt Romney's body? Mark Gammell, did you hear him embrace the UN (yes, it was Mitt Romney) and regurgitate the Obama foreign policy?  The semantics are different, but it's the same. Unbelievable!

Loren M. Lambert © October 23, 2012

Middle Class Hotels

I may be imputing my own thoughts on Mitt, but I swear he always wears the "you’re-so-full-of-scat" grin (which is the same grin I mimic when listening to him). He really gets revved up if he's laying into a woman moderator. Do you strike your "you’re-so-full-of-scat" grin when I accuse Mitt of displaying his "you’re-so-full-of-scat" grin? (If so, I’ll be able to tell if I'm full of scat for being so accusatory.)

Anyway, I didn't get to see all of the debate (just the spin, because I was in transit).  However,  I heard the president make a go at it this time. I'm going to listen to it now.

I’m currently at a Travel Lodge in downtown Orlando.  It’s not necessarily a bad place, but it could use a little more care and attention. Why do hotels seem to be of the caliber that cater to people like Mitt, or else they are of the condition that beg for a little more use before they implode?

We need some good middle-class hotels. Mitt, that could be your calling!

This week they announced world literacy rates. It's interesting to note that when education is left to the market and not publicly funded, literacy rates plummet. Countries without public education are the most backward. With all its faults, we forget what a blessing public education is and how it empowers us as a nation. It creates the meritocracy we enjoy, it does not defeat it.

I love America. It was so superb traveling. Great people, great infrastructure, great transportation system.

Loren M. Lambert © October 16, 2012

Be Careful Of the Pressure You Exert

Remember, "[a]nything would become a black hole if compressed sufficiently," says Brian Green, author, and professor of physics and mathematics at Columbia University.  So, be careful. The pressure you exert may suck you in. This explains some of my teens’ behaviors.

Loren M. Lambert © October 16, 2012

Politicians Raising Money

Mitt has been raising “mullah,” because of this pitch:

"Enter for a chance to watch the debate on Tuesday, with the Romney-Ryan team. It's sure to be another exciting night! Don't miss out!"

Obama raises money in the same way. So, I'm donating to both campaigns, because I want to rub shoulders with the royalty. God knows that's what we, Americans, care about. It doesn't matter what the policies are. We just love our celebrities.

Loren M. Lambert © October 13, 2012

LaVell Edwards on Taking Chances and Creating Needs

"So when they made me head coach, I thought, ‘Heck, they're going to fire me anyway, so I might as well try something different,’" said LaVell Edwards.

And that's how the passing game took off at BYU!

He also said, "Motivation is creating a need." Help people understand, see, or feel the need to do something, and they will.

Loren M. Lambert © October 12, 2012

Cold Syrup Cough Medicine Cup Collection

I was looking over my cold syrup cough cup collection tonight and realized I own some of the original NyQuil cups. Good memories!

One cup reminds me of when I hacked up half a lung, in the nineties. Another cup reminds me of the syrup I got, abroad, that almost put me over the legal limit, but helped me not cough at all.  I think of all the flavors. Yum! Cherry, grape, and the chalky pink stuff from years ago. It's such a joy to add a few more cups to my collection.

Cheers! May this country always be free and may the best candidate win (Obama). Bottoms up!

Loren M. Lambert © October 11, 2012

Say No to Blasphemy Laws

The United Nations is starting to lose its luster for me. It is astounding that in this day and age, allegedly rational human beings – many of them with leadership positions in the U.N. – are aggressively advocating international blasphemy laws.

Why is it so difficult for the religiously and politically blinded to understand that offense is “taken” – not “given?” What is so alluring about the power (gained by the pious and the politicians) that comes from declaring some place, some person, some idea, or some realm beyond criticism, comment, or condemnation?

Something that is inherently good or genuinely divine attracts very few antagonists or detractors because of its inherent goodness – not because any person, group, government, pope, Iman, etc. has sanctioned, imprisoned, or condemned to death anyone who would question, disrespect, or blaspheme it.

Given such inherent goodness, one can simply ignore the miscreants that attempt to convince otherwise. Do not be sucked into thinking laws should be passed to protect anyone's sensibilities or propensity to engage in violence because they have been offended.

Loren M. Lambert © October 10, 2012

Obama/Romney Debate Was a Failure!

I started my trip back east by watching the Obama/Romney debate. !$@%!!  What the !@$%@!  Call me, President Obama! I have a hundred, different, better things you could have said. You can't go up against a poli-evangelist like a whipped puppy.

Loren M. Lambert © October 8, 2012

Fitness Tip for Today

When I go to the gym, I am there for one reason: to work out, and only work out.

To enhance my workout, I like to learn by observation.

This is what I've noticed: All people (with few exceptions) who exercise on the stair master (with the revolving stairs that place you a couple stories above all the other exercise equipment), look really fit and exceptionally cool – especially those who find creative ways to climb stairs: sideways, reverse, on their butt cheeks, and on their hands.

Do it!  Let the cool and fitness factor begin.  And don’t forget to dress appropriately for the occasion.

Loren M. Lambert © October 2, 2012

The Dumb and the Delusional

It has been shown that the extent of a narcissist's delusion exponentially expands to the degree he or she thinks that everyone else is misguided and dumb.

Listening to Rush Limbaugh at noon, I loved hearing the panic and doubt in his voice, underlying a flourish of bravado he spewed out about how smart he is and how dumb and misguided the 47 percent are and how about 55 percent of the U.S. populace is.

Loren M. Lambert © September 26, 2012

The Sleeper Effect of Governmental Aid

My good friend, D. Michael Martindale, stated that a troublesome mindset develops in people when "government is taking care of" our needs. We get to thinking that "we don't have to worry about helping others." I think there is some truth to this.

However, let me draw a few fine points upon our proclivity to nap as disaster rages about us when we think Captain America is the proxy for our charity.

First, charity offered among associates, or bestowed by strangers when there is an obvious need, is more likely to be timely, specifically tailored to the scope of the problem to be re-mediated, and is given to those who genuinely merit it. That is why families, churches, and other private organizations are so good at efficiently providing this type of charity.

Second, random charity that is given long after a compelling event, or offered by strangers to strangers (though serving an important purpose at times), is often untimely, haphazard, inadequate, or disproportionate to the actual need and is therefore inefficient and more likely to be given to many who are truly free loaders. This is why we like having (at least I do) charitable organizations through which to funnel our charity, so that they can access the need and deliver the assistance in a proportionate manner.

Third, many of the most needy do not belong to churches or other charitable organizations. Moreover, many who desire to provide basic charitable services are unaffiliated with charitable organizations or are suspicious of them.

Lastly, private charity sometimes breaks down when there are persistent, somewhat invisible, long-term, chronic problems. Unfortunately, government is often best to address such problems – not because it is more efficient, but because it more easily operates in a manner that is comprehensive and does not differentiate due to color, creed, race, or political affiliation. It also, through legal constraints, must do so in a transparent manner. Therefore, it is better equipped to deal with many long-term issues like healthcare. For these reasons, many prefer such community-wide charity to be provided by government.

However, as Martindale states, too much government involvement destroys our initiative. Government programs should not displace private charitable efforts, but should only provide a minimal safety net that, when supplemented, the private sector creates the most humane, yet dynamic and productive society as possible.

Loren M. Lambert © September 25, 2012

Do People Vote For the Presidential Candidate Who Will Get Them The Most Bacon?

A few of my conservative friends are upset because they think people are voting for President Obama because he's promising to steal from the rich to give to the poor (i.e., them). They further think that President Obama – for the sole purpose of maintaining power – promises to rain riches upon them.

I will give them credit for recognizing a common human proclivity: to scratch the back of him or her who returns this favor. I admit that, indeed, it does happen. But it goes both ways.

It is naive and myopic for those same conservatives to think that conservatives and the wealthy are immune to such human corruptions. Why do the rich (some single-handedly) donate up to 70 million dollars to Mitt? Do they seek influence? Do they get benefits from politicians? Yes, they do. It's buried in legislation favoring the rich, in corporate pork, and in the awarding of government contracts.

Fact is, everybody likes bacon (vegetarian of course, otherwise, metaphorically speaking). If they believe that the cheapest way to get bacon is by voting or donating a million dollars to the candidate who can bring it home to them, then that may be the only reason they do so.

Here are the differences between Mitt Romney and President Obama:

Obama is authentic. Although the realities of politics has blunted President Obama's ability to achieve all of his goals, and those who thought he was bringing Camelot are disappointed, he has stayed on track with what he believes and knows to be the best choice for all Americans – from saving the banks, and Detroit (not popular with the masses) to achieving an historic reform of our healthcare insurance. (A small part of this insurance is not popular with the conservatives, the wealthy, and those who already have insurance and don't want anyone else to have it [yes, this is my spin, but it’s the correct spin: The healthy and wealthy just want an exclusive club of the healthy and wealthy]).

Mitt is not authentic, nor sincere. He changes his position when it suits him, based upon who and where he thinks he can get the most money. Also, he really, sincerely does not view himself as the candidate for all Americans, but the candidate for the rich, and for those he can bamboozle. He wants to tie the rest of us up on the roof of the Winnebago, and then the Cruise liner, while he and his buddies go on a wild romp through America and straight to the Cayman Islands. He's “written us off.”

So, vote for the candidate who truly wants to bring home the bacon for all Americans: President Obama.  Don’t vote for the candidate who wants to bring home the bacon for himself and a few of his millionaire donors.

Loren M. Lambert © September 24, 2012

In All of Our History, Charity Has Never Been Enough

While charity should be the impetus to much of our actions, and while it is the essential character that makes a nation built by co-operational sacrifice worth living in, it has never, in the history of humanity, been enough.

Charity has never built a national infrastructure, never trained a police force, never assembled an army, never saved an endangered species, never cleaned up a river, never maintained the rule of law, and never built a nation. Unfortunately, charity (which has always had a place unfettered and unrestrained by government, corporate power, or peer pressure in a modern nation) never has, never will, and never can cause a healthcare system to be built solely upon the principles of market forces, alone, and to provide access to its necessary resources in a fair, efficient, and equitable manner.

All charity can do is blunt its sharp edges. In fact, charity is the antithesis of the market system. Market forces dictate that no food, water, housing, education, healthcare, or comfort should be given to those who cannot directly pay for them, regardless of the reasons for their need.

Loren M. Lambert © September 23, 2012

“Sacred Cow” Tax Deductions

I listened to one of those financial planners on the Glen Beck station. He said he has a strategy to help avoid all taxes at retirement, since "sacred cow" tax deductions will always be there.

Isn't that what Mitt Romney is against? Isn't that the problem with any tax reform efforts: that we’ve invited so many sacred cows into our holy of holies?

In listening to non-aligned tax experts, I heard them indicate that many of those "sacred cows” (which are needing to be sent to the “knockers” [not all, they say – a few really do promote a benefit to all]) are promoted by conservatives.

Loren M. Lambert © September 22, 2012

A Paradoxical Quote of The Day From Ben Stein (I stole this and must “one-up” it.)

"Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen."

But, I say:

“Fathom the hypocrisy of people who claim to be the Chosen of God, who require every person to prove they are healthy and a citizen before they will extend to them the opportunity to access healthcare." (A Paradoxical Quote of the Day from Loren M. Lambert)

Loren M. Lambert © September 22, 2012

When The Clinically Paranoid, Delusional, and Ignorant Swarm

The internet is an amazing tool, because it gives everyone with access to it a voice.

Unfortunately, as often occurs in two-party politics, those with minds that race with delusions, clinical paranoia, and abject hatred can appear as a significant sounding block.

Be discerning. While the village crackpot was known and easily disregarded, a distant village crackpot can give him or herself a degree, an un-examined sales pitch, and a huckster polish with just a few easy tools, and they'll have the appearance of the most credible leader in your local community.

The crackpot swarm is in full fury at this time. Lots of scams are swirling out there. Don't be bitten.

Loren M. Lambert © September 20, 2012

Rationing Of Healthcare: A Change In Who Gets Kidneys

No matter how you cut it, rationing of healthcare has been an ongoing issue since the very beginning of man’s ability to provide it. In the U.S. there are exponentially more people needing kidney transplants than there are kidneys. It used to be that those longest on the list were first to get the kidney. Considerations are now underway to change that policy to cater to who is the “best fit” for the available kidney – as far as getting the most mileage out of it. What do you think?

Any way you cut it, there are advantages and disadvantages. Should kidneys be given to the highest bidders? Currently, the policy resembles college sports: Only the people who set up the “game” (i.e., doctors and the hospital) make money off the kidney. 

I say: Set up loose guidelines that take into consideration a number of factors (i.e., age, health, habits, prognosis, etc.) and then the allocate them in a lottery among those who scored highest.

Loren M. Lambert © September 20, 2012

What a Beautiful Day and Night

I attended two hearings today and I have to admit, it is so emotionally draining!

The best attorneys maintain a detached aloofness from their client's cases so they can be objective and see things from all sides, yet also hold some affinity for the case so they can empathize and feel the pain, the justice, and the validity of the case. Easy said, hard to do.

My problem is that these cases really tear me up. The struggles and difficulties with which others must deal are overwhelming. It's not easy to be cold and calculating in such situations.

Most of us are so blessed to have so much: security, freedom, liberty, sufficient material comforts, good health, and appreciative companionship. Cherish what you have. Do what you can to bring joy to others.

Loren M. Lambert © September 19, 2012

Mitt Romney's New Campaign Slogan: "If Only I Were Latino – A Change We Can Genetically Believe In."

A sense of humor is much different from being flippant, dismissive, and arrogant. While I can appreciate a leader who shows a sense of humor and even fumbles a punch line or two, a flippant, dismissive, and arrogant president poses a danger because he does not poise humility and confidence that this great office requires. Sorry, Mr. Romney, but you are not the man for the job. You are a great business man. And since there are still a lot of businesses to create, come out of retirement and spend your life doing what you do best.

Loren M. Lambert © September 18, 2012

The Parable of the Mitt Romney (Book of Duke 10:25-37, King James Bible)

Then Jesus answered and said: “A certain man, a known liberal/progressive and President Obama supporter, went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, who stripped him of his clothing, wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.

By chance, a certain tea party member came down that road, but fearing thieves went another way and never saw the man.

Likewise, an unemployed worker was headed that way, but ran out of gas money and did not reach the place where the liberal lay.

Due to budget cuts, no police or other people came down that road.

Then, a government drone journeyed overhead and flew over where the Obama supporter lay. A government official saw the drone in his monitor and reported it to his boss, Mr. Mitt Romney.  Romney responded, ‘This Obama supporter is too dependent on the government. He believes he is a victim, and he believes government has a responsibility to care for him. He needs to take personal responsibility and care for his own life, so don’t worry about him. Let him lie. If someone comes upon him, perhaps they will take care of him.’ So, Romney sent no one to him to bandage his wounds, give him medicine, convey him home, house him, or take care of him.

Which of these three do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves?”

And the Republican said, “Mitt Romney was the neighbor, because he showed him how to be independent and not rely on the nanny state.”

Then Jesus said to him, “Go and do likewise.”

Loren M. Lambert © September 17, 2012

I Got to Play Viking Warrior!

I got to play Viking Warrior today. It was almost as fun as gardening.  It was, also, twice as fun as arguing about who's too dovish and who's too hawkish, and who, like Goldilocks, is “just right.”

Loren M. Lambert © September 15, 2012

Medical Price-Gouging

Here's the problem with U.S. medical care:

Mountain West Anesthesia charges $608 for one shot in the arm.  A PPO (Preferred Provider Organization) discount reduces the amount to $521.07. What the @#$%!??? You medical people: Tell me where all the money goes! (Don't get side-tracked! Only about .003 of all medical expenses go to medical malpractice coverage!)

Loren M. Lambert © September 13, 2012

McCain Schools Hannity

Sean Hannity got schooled by the honorable John McCain. (Yes, I believe McCain is an honorable and very intelligent man. His loss of the election had nothing to do with his competence and more to do with the historical climate at the time.)

To all my far-right friends: Let's assume that Hannity was right in asserting that President Obama "let the Muslim brotherhood rise to power in Egypt" (which is pure, unadulterated, dead, brine fly sludge), and tell me what President Obama should have done.

To you, fact checkers: Was Hitler really democratically elected (as claimed by a Hannity guest)? My recollection is that his jackboots were already kicking the stuffing out of people and the Germans caved. If he was democratically elected, then what went wrong? Could the world have prevented it or contained it? (I think it could have been contained and it should have started when he commenced invading other countries and/or massacring Germany's citizens.)

I must undergo a politics fast for three days so I can lower my blood pressure.

Loren M. Lambert © September 13, 2012

What Right Wing [Your Adjective Here] Mean When They Call Us Marxist (as Set Forth By Mark Gammell)

Let me summarize, if I understand you, Mark: A Marxist is someone who advocates the use of any means (especially including violent revolution) to bring about socialist dictatorship with the following objectives, and with the following proof that the U.S. is Marxist:

1. Abolition of private property in land, and application of all rents of land to public purpose.

Mark, you believe that "eminent domain," the power that “takes” through judicial process and pays market value for land for public use is Marxist. You further believe that property taxes, "environmental" regulations that affect the use of private property, and the seizure of property through forfeiture actions from criminal syndicates or drug dealers, who purchase property with money obtained through illegal means, is Marxist.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Mark, you believe that “[t]he 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and various state income taxes established a major Marxist coup in the United States many decades ago. You believe that “taxes continue to drain the lifeblood out of the American economy and greatly reduce the accumulation of desperately needed capital for future growth, business starts, job creation, and salary increases.”

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Mark, you believe that, “[a]nother Marxian attack on private property rights is in the form of federal & state estate taxes and other inheritance taxes, which you claim have abolished, or at least, greatly diluted the right of private property owners to determine the disposition and distribution of their estates upon their death. Instead, government bureaucrats get their greedy hands involved.”

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

I don’t see that this is much different than #1, above, but apparently, Mark, you believe that without justification and without due process, the government is unlawfully seizing property through tax liens, forfeiture actions, and unlawful imprisonment of terrorists and those who speak out or write against the "government."

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

Mark, you believe that “the Federal Reserve System politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting [whatever that means] in the United States.”

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.

Mark, you believe that due to the U.S. and state governments’ “control” over communication, transportation, aviation, postal service, AMTRAK and CONRAIL, and other outright socialist (government-owned) enterprises, we are a Marxist nation.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

Mark, you believe that “while the U.S. does not have vast ‘collective farms,’ we nevertheless do have a significant degree of government involvement in agriculture in the form of price support subsidies and acreage allotments and land-use controls,” and that our management of federal lands (e.g., national forest), as well as the BLM, and “the IRS control of business through corporate regulations,” means that we are Marxist.

8. Equal obligation of all to work.

Mark, you believe that the U.S. has established “industrial armies,” especially for agriculture, through the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. You believe that the national debt and inflation, caused by the “communal bank,” has caused the need for a “two-income" family and that the following is Marxist: women in the workplace (since the 1920s), the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution (giving women the right to vote), the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted socialist unions (I guess this means all unions???), affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program, Executive Order 11000, The Equal Rights Amendment (which you believe means that women should do all work that men do – including the military – and since passage, it would make women subject to the draft).

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

Mark, you believe that through the “Planning Reorganization Act of 1949, zoning and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "Law" 89-136, that these are Marxist, and the Gov’ment is somehow bringing this coast to coast equalization into being.

10. Free education for all children in government schools.

Mark, you believe that the abolition of children's factory labor, and educating kids in “public schools which train the young to work for the communal debt system,” along with the Department of Education, the NEA, and Outcome-Based "Education, are Marxist.

Loren M. Lambert © September 12, 2012

Virtual Pregnancy for Men

Wouldn't it be cool if able-bodied men, who strongly support a ban on all abortions, could volunteer to have the fetus of a conception by rape transferred to their body in some violent forceful fashion, where they could go through the pregnancy and then raise the child? How many would volunteer?

Loren M. Lambert © September 12, 2012

Re: Our Soldiers and the Middle East

Dear Mr. Romney,

Don't criticize what a soldier does to defuse a volatile situation when he or she is out-gunned and surrounded, whether in a bunker or in an embassy. Moreover, don't forget you heard it from me.
         
Here's the deal on the Middle East: There's not a single person in (or out of) the United States government who can make it run the way we want it, but we can make it worse by thinking that we can. That's the way we messed it up in the first place.

Loren M. Lambert © September 12, 2012

TV’s "So, You Think You Can Dance" Showcases Great Talent!

Did you see Cyrus and Twitch on TV’s American dance competition show, So, You Think You Can Dance? Shadang! I love a country that produces great art! It goes hand-in-hand with freedom.

           Don't forget that, conservatives!  We need you right-wing conservative nut cases to keep us organized. We need our artists to make life worth living, and to curb your ridiculous extremes and visa versa.

          I got my copies of the 2009 film, Yankles, today.  I'm very stoked!

Loren M. Lambert © September 11, 2012

True Healing Comes From Within Our Own Hearts

Be mindful that the evil upon which you fix your eyes does not work its way into your soul to become the evil that you inflict upon others in the name of justice. We recognize the wrongs that are committed by the few and respond in a measured and reciprocal manner, understanding that healing comes from within our own hearts, not from bringing justice to those that never had one.

Loren M. Lambert © September 11, 2012

Romney Makes Promises, But Discusses Not How

Governor Romney is now saying he would preserve some of the Obama healthcare reforms. This is a step back from his promise: "The first thing I'll do is repeal Obamacare!" He said he'll keep the provisions that disallow denials of coverage for pre-existing conditions and for dropping you if you get sick.

However, many good, smart people struggled with this issue and realized that to make it work (when you increase what's covered, you increase the expense) you have to provide a way that gets everyone insured so everyone contributes. How is he going to do that? He hasn't said “how,” has he? In fact, he hasn't said how he plans on doing lot of things.

It's so easy to make the feel-good promises to:  lower taxes, create a billion jobs, make us energy dependent, and move all the oil to our country by surreptitiously drilling a transcontinental underground pipe into everyone's oil fields and drain them. It's hard to explain “how” to carry out promises. 

Mitt is long on promises and short on well-thought-out answers on how he'll fulfill them.

Loren M. Lambert © September 10, 2012

Republican Policies

The only true principles of the current right-wing Republicans is figuring out how to get the most money to the fewest people, so they can pass it back and forth without having to dirty their hands by talking to someone outside their gated communities. The rest of the country can just fall off into some sludge-filled cesspool.

The Republicans dress their policies up in a lot of holier-than-thou hypocrisy so they can sell it to the unblinking-night-of-mind-numb-zombie social conservatives.

Loren M. Lambert © September 7, 2012

Obama Speech Outlines Agenda

I appreciated the thoughtfulness and authenticity of President Obama's speech.

I blanch at both parties’ grandiose promises.

New York Times Op-Ed columnist, David Brooks, commented that he was disappointed that there was no grand vision and Obama’s speech proposals were too incremental.

The reality is: President Obama has already laid the foundation for his proposals, and now he needs to perfect them by attacking healthcare costs, simplifying the tax codes, keeping the recovery on track, and keeping a cool head on foreign affairs.

President Clinton clearly delineated the choice between candidate Romney, a man who knows how to create personal wealth by outsourcing and banking offshore, and President Obama, who knows how to create national wealth by investing in the well-being of all Americans and bulking up our infrastructure.

Loren M. Lambert © September 6, 2012

Herb Cowan On Self-Inflicted Injuries

I told Herb Cowan (my mentor and large vegetable farmer) about my self-inflicted injury from working out, yesterday. He said, "You have the same problem that many of the young have. You shouldn't confuse the difficulty and strenuous nature of an activity with its benefits and long-term rewards. If a young buck obliterates a rival male, or makes a miraculous escape from a predator, but gets fatally gored or breaks a leg in the process, the does are not impressed. They only care if he's around when it counts." My son then piped in, "How do you know when it counts?" With a twinkle in his eye, Cowan answered,"Usually that's pretty obvious, but when it's not, knowing is what separates the boys from the men."

Loren M. Lambert © September 4, 2012

Balancing Mortality With Desire To Live Life Fully

Balancing my mortality with my desire to live life fully is often a weekly readjustment. Unable to restrain the influence of a few jump ropers in my Meisner class, I attempted to regain the finesse I once mastered doing this for exercise many years ago. This was when I could do a slew of “doubles” consecutively, along with a bunch of other tricks to make the hoodlums in the area think I could box. Currently, the mind is willing, the muscle memory remembers, but the body vehicle just says, no. How many times do I need to figure that out?

On a more fruitful note, I celebrated Labor Day by engaging in the excitement of cleaning the garage and curtilage around the house. I love a clean garage almost as much as a ride in the Space Shuttle Endeavour. Thanks, kids, for a lovely day. Can't wait for the next cleaning project on Columbus Day.

Loren M. Lambert © September 3, 2012

Thinking Apocalyptic

Whenever I start thinking apocalyptic, I console myself, knowing that people are edible. Therefore, the good, Christian people with lots of guns will survive to re-people the earth. I find further solace in the fact that a lot of liberals and progressives will be very tasty, because they can be honestly labeled organic, lean, and free-ranging.

Loren M. Lambert © September 2, 2012